In the intricate ecosystem of international arbitration, the choice of the “seat” or “legal place” of the arbitration is far more than a mere formality. It is a critical strategic decision that defines the juridical framework of the proceedings. The seat determines the procedural law governing the arbitration (lex arbitri), the courts that will exercise supervisory jurisdiction, and the legal framework for the recognition and enforceability of the final award. It is the arbitration’s legal anchor. Through the seat, the arbitration is situated within a defined national legal framework. For too long, complex commercial disputes involving African parties have been anchored elsewhere – London, Paris, Johannesburg.
While these centres are excellent, there is a powerful and compelling case to be made for a dominant regional hub in the heart of Africa: Nigeria. As a practitioner, I am convinced that Nigeria is not just an alternative but is now poised to become the preeminent choice for international arbitration in the region. The foundation for this ascent is already firmly in place, built on three robust pillars.
Pillar 1: A Modern and Progressive Legal Framework
Nigeria’s arbitration law is no longer a nascent text; it is a framework that has evolved into a modern, sophisticated, and pro-arbitration statute with the enactment of the Arbitration and Mediation Act (AMA) 2023. The AMA 2023 represents a significant leap forward. It incorporates best international practices, being largely modelled on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1 (1985, amended 2006). It introduces key provisions that address the practical needs of parties:
i. Emergency Arbitrator Provisions: Parties may apply for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator to obtain urgent interim relief before 2 the tribunal is constituted.
ii. Mechanisms for Dismissal of Claims: This allows tribunals to terminate or dismiss claims where a party defaults, including failure to state the 3 4 claim, inordinate or inexcusable delay, or failure 5 to provide security for costs.
iii. Enhanced Powers for Tribunals: The Act strengthens the tribunal’s authority to grant 6 interim measures. It also empowers tribunals to manage proceedings flexibly, determining the procedure, admissibility of evidence, conduct of hearings, joinder of parties, and remedies in a manner that ensures efficiency and fairness.
iv. Express Adoption of the Kompetenz-Kompetenz Principle: It firmly entrenches the tribunal’s 8 power to rule on its own jurisdiction.
This legislative framework provides parties with a legal environment that is efficient, predictable, and aligned with global standards.
Pillar 2: A Deep Bench of Legal and Industry Expertise
A legal framework is only as strong as the people who operate it. Here, Nigeria holds a distinct advantage.
Legal Talent: Nigeria has one of the largest and most sophisticated legal professions in Africa. Our senior lawyers, including a growing corps of seasoned arbitrators, are regularly engaged in high-stakes, cross-border disputes. They are familiar with complex commercial, energy, construction, and finance sectors that are the lifeblood of international arbitration.
Specialised Institutions: The Nigerian Institute of Chartered Arbitrators (NICArb) is at the forefront of promoting arbitration ethics and continuous professional development. Its mission is to cultivate a large, highly skilled, ethical, and diverse pool of arbitrators. There is also the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) Nigeria Branch, the Lagos Court of Arbitration (LCA), the Maritime Arbitrators Association of Nigeria (MAAN), and its pool of arbitrators.
Judicial Support: The Nigerian judiciary has increasingly demonstrated a pro-arbitration stance. Our courts are becoming more accustomed to their supportive, rather than interventionist, role – focusing on upholding arbitration agreements and enforcing awards, save for in the most exceptional of circumstances.
In Statoil (Nigeria) Ltd & Anor v. Nigerian National 9 Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) & 2 Ors, and more recently in NNPC v. Fung Tai Engineering Company 10 Limited, the appellate courts affirmed the finality of arbitral awards and the limits of judicial intervention. This evolving jurisprudence reinforces the reliability of arbitration in Nigeria.
Pillar 3: Economic Imperative and Geographic Imperium
The most compelling argument is often economic in nature. Africa is a continent of immense economic opportunity, and Nigeria is its largest economy. It is counterintuitive that disputes arising from investments and trade within Africa are consistently resolved outside of Africa. This export of legal services incurs significant costs in foreign currency and deprives the region of local control and capacity building opportunities.
Choosing Nigeria as a seat offers
Proximity and Cultural Affinity: Parties benefit from a seat in a similar time zone, with arbitrators and counsel who have an innate understanding of the African business context and nuances.
Cost-Effectiveness: Conducting an arbitration in Lagos is invariably more cost-effective than in many traditional hubs, without any compromise on quality.
Regional Leadership: As Nigeria’s economy continues to integrate with its neighbours, positioning Lagos as a dispute resolution hub is a natural extension of its economic influence.
The Path Forward: A Collective Responsibility
Realising this potential is not automatic. It requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders:
a. We, the practitioners, must continue to uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in every appointment we undertake.
b. Corporate counsel and in-house lawyers, particularly in major corporations and state-owned enterprises, must be bold in specifying “Nigeria” as the seat of arbitration in their contracts.
c. The government must continue its supportive role by ensuring the judiciary is consistently resourced and aligned with the pro-arbitration goals of the 2023 Act.
Conclusion
The stars are aligning for Nigerian arbitration. We have the law, we have the talent, and we have the economic need. The choice of a seat signals confidence in a legal system. It is time for the world, and indeed for Africans, to place that confidence in Nigeria.
Nigeria as a seat of arbitration is a choice that strengthens our institutions, builds capacity, and asserts the country’s position in the realm of international commerce.
Nigeria is more than arbitration ready. The seat awaits.
____________________________________________
Professor Fabian Ajogwu, SAN, FCArb
President, Nigerian Institute of Chartered Arbitrators
Formerly Vice-President, Lagos Court of Arbitration (2010-2018)